Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Buble results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,163 hits. Analysis detected 8,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,792 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (24,893 of 34,830 keywords). This Michael Buble is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Michael Buble
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
29%Michael Buble (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,792
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 22.1%22.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate