Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael Alfonso results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 483 hits . Analysis detected 3,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,832 keywords). This Michael Alfonso is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michael Alfonso
Keyword details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst