Keyword summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Metropolitik results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 693 hits . Analysis detected 3,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (14,129 of 53,697 keywords). This Metropolitik is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Metropolitik
Keyword details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst