Keyword summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Metro Police results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 3,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,534 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,080 of 37,536 keywords). This Metro Police is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Metro Police
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Metro Police (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,534
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos