Keyword summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Merit results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 843 hits . Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,670 of 37,536 keywords). This Merit is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Merit
Keyword details
Total words: 2,536
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 33.2% 33.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst