Keyword summary
27%4 analyzed articles/videos1,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mergers And Acquisitions results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 839 hits. Analysis detected 5,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,042 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,201 of 35,635 keywords). This Mergers And Acquisitions is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Mergers And Acquisitions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
24%Mergers And Acquisitions (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate