Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Meredith Family results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 583 hits . Analysis detected 4,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Meredith Family is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Meredith Family
Keyword details
Total words: 5,632
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst