Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mercenaries results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 598 hits . Analysis detected 3,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,618 of 37,536 keywords). This Mercenaries is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Mercenaries
Keyword details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst