Special Forces commando at heart of $1.5M-a-month mercenary killing unit funded by royal family: Suit 57%

By Jeremy Louwerse0%

4/2/2026, 4:52:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 2,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 866 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,566 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the article peer group.

A former Special Forces commando made millions of dollars carrying out assassinations for the United Arab Emirates, new court documents claim. 
Abraham Golan, a mercenary allegedly behind a botched plot to kill a member of Yemen’s House of Representatives, has been named a defendant by Anssaf Ali Mayo, who barely escaped death at Golan’s hands, the papers allege. 
In August 2015, Golan, along with former Navy SEAL Issac Gilmore, started Spear Operations group in Rancho Santa Fe in San Diego. 
Gilmore and Golan stand in front of a United Arab Emirates aircraft. 
Golan and some mercenaries. 
The two pitched and reached an agreement with the UAE to carry out “targeted assassinations” on the empire’s behalf, the lawsuit claims. 
In return, Spear would allegedly be paid $1.5 million a month plus bonuses for successful killings. 
The deal was allegedly brokered over lunch at an Italian restaurant in the officers’ club of a UAE military base in Abu Dubai by Mohammed Dahlan, a former security chief for the Palestinian Authority. 
Gilmore, Dahlan, and Golan. 
“There was a targeted assassination program in Yemen. 
I was running it. 
We did it. 
It was sanctioned by the UAE within the coalition,” Golan allegedly said, according to the papers. 
Once the deal with the UAE was reached, the two recruited former members of the military, a key point in their pitch to the UAE, including Dale Comstock, a former member of US Army Special Forces, who was paid $40,000 a month plus bonuses to run the killing team. 
The group was assembled by the December. 
They allegedly loaded on to a chartered jet at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey and flew to Yemen with body armor and specialized tools to prepare explosives. 
Golan, Gilmore and his “Assassination Team” 
They also allegedly packed a few weeks’ worth of military “meals ready to eat,” and three cases of Basil Hayden’s since it would be impossible to get any alcohol in Yemen. 
Per the lawsuit, their main target was Mayo, who was at the top of the list to eliminate because he was a member of the al-Islah party, Yemen's second-largest political group, which is linked to the UAE's enemy the Muslim Brotherhood. 
--- 
The alleged plan was to set off explosives at the al-Islah political party headquarters in Aden, where he worked, and kill off any survivors with small firearms, the papers say. 
Drone footage captured the dramatic assassination attempt. 
The team drove up to the headquarters where Comstock allegedly placed an explosive charge loaded with shrapnel and detonated the device. 
Drone footage of the attempt to kill Anssaf Ali Mayo. 
A huge explosion rocked the building, shots were fired, and then the footage showed a second explosion caused by a booby trapped SUV designed to add to the destruction. 
“I was gonna try to open the door, throw a couple hand grenades, and then just go in there and shoot everyone,” Comstock said, according to the lawsuit. 
Mayo, had been told his life was in danger and fled moments before the explosion ripped through the building and survived. 
He claims he suffered "psychological and emotional trauma” from the event and now lives in exile in Saudi Arabia. 
Golan, in full tactical gear, has a smoke. 
He then allegedly put $40,000 on the table. 
Comstock took the money and the position, the court papers claim. 
He was paid $40,000 a month plus bonuses, according to the lawsuit. 
Golan also hired Gilmore as COO of Spear in October 2015. 
Gilmore had been decommissioned from the US Military in 2011 for accidentally shooting a Navy Seal during a training exercise. 
Since 2016, Mayo has lived apart from his wife and children who still live in Yemen. 
He sees them once a year, the papers say. 
A Spear business card. 
He’s seeking compensatory and punitive damages, attorney fees, and a court order that stops the killing team from targeting him. 
Golan, Gilmore, and Comstock are all listed as defendants. 
The papers say Gilmore is a US citizen and resident of San Diego and Golen, an Israeli-Hungarian citizen, now lives in Westport, Ct. 
Comstock is a US citizen and lives in Indonesia, the lawsuit says. 
According to Golan, the Spear killing team continued to assassinate targets in Yemen requested by the UAE and was responsible for a number of high profile assassinations after the botched attempt on Mayo, according to the lawsuit. 
A UN group of experts states in the papers that it "found reasonable grounds to believe that the United Arab Emirates are responsible for the 10 assassinations in Aden it investigated.” 
The UAE's intervention into Yemen is attributed to three reason in the lawsuit. 
The first states given Iran's support of the Houthis, the UAE sought to prevent Iran from expanding its influence into Yemen. 
The second points to UAE's "trading ambitions" and desire to control the Gulf of Aden, so they would be able to bypass the strait of Hormuz, "which Iran has frequently threatened to shut down”, the papers say. 
The third, says UAE wanted to eliminate the al-Islah, a Yemeni political party that Mayo was a member of. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 3.6%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias12.4%This article: 2.3%Jeremy Louwerse: 1.2%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 9.9%Jeremy Louwerse: 4.5%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 1.0%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.2%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.9%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Jeremy Louwerse: 11.7%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect14.7%This article: 1.8%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.6%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.8%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.2%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.4%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.4%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 28.8%Jeremy Louwerse: 19.2%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias28.8%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.7%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.0%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error2.4%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Jeremy Louwerse: 1.4%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias6.9%This article: 3.1%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.6%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.1%This article: 5.7%Jeremy Louwerse: 1.9%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.7%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.8%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.5%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.7%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.3%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.8%Jeremy Louwerse: 3.9%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority24.8%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.6%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.2%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.2%This article: 7.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 4.0%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization7.4%This article: 3.6%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.7%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring3.6%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.6%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.7%Jeremy Louwerse: 10.6%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion17.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 1.3%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 1.8%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.4%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 19.6%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.3%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof19.6%This article: 4.7%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.7%Jeremy Louwerse: 3.7%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal5.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 3.6%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.4%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.4%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.3%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.5%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy2.3%This article: 8.4%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.9%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 1.7%Jeremy Louwerse: 2.7%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 10.3%Jeremy Louwerse: 16.4%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice10.3%This article: 2.5%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.4%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 4.2%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy Louwerse: 0.7%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

866 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech746writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageAbraham Golan • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDale Comstock • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAnssaf Ali Mayo • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAnssaf Ali Mayo • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAbraham Golan • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dale Comstock

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words23% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+96.1 ptsWriter: 3.9%Dale Comstock: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Dale Comstock: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Dale Comstock: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Dale Comstock: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.