Keyword summary
98%2 analyzed articles/videos817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Men In Women's Spaces results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 5,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,013 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (5,630 of 58,287 keywords). This Men In Women's Spaces is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Men In Women's Spaces
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
91%Men In Women's Spaces (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,013
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.3% percentile
5.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 32.9%32.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 32.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate