Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Men Employment results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 835 hits. Analysis detected 3,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,151 of 37,536 keywords). This Men Employment is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Men Employment
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
44%Men Employment (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.2%20.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos