Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Memory Costs results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 4,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,466 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,400 of 35,713 keywords). This Memory Costs is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Memory Costs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
83%Memory Costs (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,466
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos