Keyword summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mel Gibson results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,626 hits . Analysis detected 15,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,538 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,684 of 37,536 keywords). This Mel Gibson is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Mel Gibson
Keyword details
Total words: 15,538
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst