Keyword summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medusa Point results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 433 hits . Analysis detected 2,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,446 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,251 of 37,536 keywords). This Medusa Point is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Medusa Point
Keyword details
Total words: 1,446
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.0% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.9% 29.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst