Keyword summary
37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meadows results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 5,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,591 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,159 of 37,536 keywords). This Meadows is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Meadows
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
15%Meadows (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,591
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos