Keyword summary
33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mci Framingham results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 482 hits . Analysis detected 3,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,009 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,210 of 37,536 keywords). This Mci Framingham is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Mci Framingham
Keyword details
Total words: 6,009
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst