Keyword summary
â 36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mccormack Dickstein Committee results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 3,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of â 24% (28,797 of 37,536 keywords). This Mccormack Dickstein Committee is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Mccormack Dickstein Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 5,688
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst