Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Mcconnell results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 755 hits . Analysis detected 5,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,334 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,969 keywords). This Mcconnell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mcconnell
Keyword details
Total words: 6,334
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst