Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maya Lin results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 1,417 hits. Analysis detected 4,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,321 keywords). This Maya Lin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maya Lin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Maya Lin (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 48.8%48.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 27.0%27.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 48.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos