Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maurice Glasman results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,140 of 35,700 keywords). This Maurice Glasman is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Maurice Glasman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
92%Maurice Glasman (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 969
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.2% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles969 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 31.4%31.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 18.5%18.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 31.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos