Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Lopez results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 213 hits . Analysis detected 1,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,573 of 37,536 keywords). This Matthew Lopez is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Matthew Lopez
Keyword details
Total words: 636
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.8% percentile 11.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles636 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 33.5% 33.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 29.4% 29.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 29.4%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst