Keyword summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Taibbi results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 3,252 hits . Analysis detected 16,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,959 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,207 of 35,908 keywords). This Matt Taibbi is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Matt Taibbi
Keyword details
Total words: 7,959
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.9% percentile 5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 40.9% 40.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst