Keyword summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Rogers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 262 hits . Analysis detected 2,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (23,642 of 36,753 keywords). This Matt Rogers is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Matt Rogers
Keyword details
Total words: 3,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst