Keyword summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matilda results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 307 hits . Analysis detected 1,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,473 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,802 of 37,536 keywords). This Matilda is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Matilda
Keyword details
Total words: 1,473
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.8% 20.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst