Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mate Conmigo results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 392 hits. Analysis detected 2,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (17,118 of 37,536 keywords). This Mate Conmigo is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Mate Conmigo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
55%Mate Conmigo (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos