Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mass Graves results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,367 hits. Analysis detected 7,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,138 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (18,689 of 36,178 keywords). This Mass Graves is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Mass Graves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
49%Mass Graves (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,138
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 13.6%13.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos