Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maryland Democratic Party results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Horn Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 476 hits. Analysis detected 2,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Maryland Democratic Party is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maryland Democratic Party
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 27.1%27.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 38.4%38.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 38.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos