Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Stewart results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Biased Writer Voice , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 699 hits . Analysis detected 4,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,621 of 37,536 keywords). This Martha Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Martha Stewart
Keyword details
Total words: 6,360
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst