Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Martha Mcsally results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 852 hits. Analysis detected 5,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,073 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,715 keywords). This Martha Mcsally is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Martha Mcsally
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Martha Mcsally (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,073
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 41.1%41.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 28.1%28.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 41.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 28.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos