Keyword summary
81%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Castex Tatum results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,529 of 35,445 keywords). This Martha Castex Tatum is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Martha Castex Tatum
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
54%Martha Castex Tatum (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,986
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos