Keyword summary
62% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Manipulation results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,862 hits . Analysis detected 13,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,138 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,028 of 37,536 keywords). This Market Manipulation is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Market Manipulation
Keyword details
Total words: 12,138
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst