Keyword summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos1,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Cuban results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 881 hits. Analysis detected 5,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,081 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (15,247 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Cuban is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Mark Cuban
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠60%Mark Cuban (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,081
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 12.8%12.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos