Keyword summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Amodei results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,072 hits . Analysis detected 6,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,625 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,558 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Amodei is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Mark Amodei
Keyword details
Total words: 5,625
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst