Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Alford results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 2,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,640 of 35,718 keywords). This Mark Alford is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Mark Alford
Keyword details
Total words: 2,636
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst