Keyword summary
2%2 analyzed articles/videos1,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariska Hargitay results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,110 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (35,635 of 35,734 keywords). This Mariska Hargitay is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Mariska Hargitay
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
1%Mariska Hargitay (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,110
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.6%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos