Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mario Perez results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,185 of 36,710 keywords). This Mario Perez is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Mario Perez
Keyword details
Total words: 4,028
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst