Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariachi Divas results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 1,763 hits. Analysis detected 12,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,477 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,482 of 36,739 keywords). This Mariachi Divas is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Mariachi Divas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
94%Mariachi Divas (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,477
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 39.3%39.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 39.4%39.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.7%18.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 39.4%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 39.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos