Keyword summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Cucurella results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 705 hits . Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,464 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,262 of 37,536 keywords). This Marc Cucurella is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Marc Cucurella
Keyword details
Total words: 5,464
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst