Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video325 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mannequin results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,626 of 37,536 keywords). This Mannequin is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Mannequin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
61%Mannequin (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos