Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan Da results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 1,122 hits. Analysis detected 7,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (8,824 of 37,536 keywords). This Manhattan Da is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Manhattan Da
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠77%Manhattan Da (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos