Keyword summary
78% 4 analyzed articles/videos 591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manchester results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,296 hits . Analysis detected 13,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,662 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,405 of 37,536 keywords). This Manchester is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Manchester
Keyword details
Total words: 11,662
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst