Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malik Beasley results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 521 hits . Analysis detected 2,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,550 of 37,536 keywords). This Malik Beasley is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Malik Beasley
Keyword details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst