Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malay Cuisine results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 2,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,903 of 37,536 keywords). This Malay Cuisine is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Malay Cuisine
Keyword details
Total words: 2,668
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst