Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Makeup Services results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 444 hits . Analysis detected 2,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,246 of 37,536 keywords). This Makeup Services is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Makeup Services
Keyword details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Red Herring: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst