Keyword summary
81% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maine Senate Bid results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,070 hits . Analysis detected 6,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,099 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (19,981 of 35,288 keywords). This Maine Senate Bid is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Maine Senate Bid
Keyword details
Total words: 6,099
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst