Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Magnifica Humanitas results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 409 hits . Analysis detected 2,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (7,018 of 37,536 keywords). This Magnifica Humanitas is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Magnifica Humanitas
Keyword details
Total words: 1,532
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 26.7% 26.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst