Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Macbeth results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,670 hits. Analysis detected 9,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,735 of 37,536 keywords). This Macbeth is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Macbeth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
61%Macbeth (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.1%22.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos