Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maarten Boudry results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 269 hits . Analysis detected 962 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (29,180 of 37,536 keywords). This Maarten Boudry is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Maarten Boudry
Keyword details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst