Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lynette Hooker results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Personal Incredulity as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 3,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,375 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,349 of 35,713 keywords). This Lynette Hooker is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Lynette Hooker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
55%Lynette Hooker (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,375
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos