Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lummi Nation results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 1,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (14,000 of 34,992 keywords). This Lummi Nation is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Lummi Nation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
60%Lummi Nation (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos